Running the finance close…
Intake · classify · extract · link · validate · report · analyze
ARCHON DEMO IKEJanuary 2026
Revenue, EBITDA, and closing cash · Jan → May 2026
Revenue → COGS → gross profit → opex → EBITDA
Opening → collections → outflows → closing
Actual vs goal by salesperson
Top 3 vendors = 75% of spend
Customer & supplier ledgers, reconciled to the close
Derived from the period’s posted invoices — totals reconcile to revenue / COGS; open items to receivables / payables.
Receivables, payables, VAT & conversion gap
Cash is tied up for -1 days between paying suppliers and collecting from customers — a €16.5K funding requirement.
3 employees · true employer cost vs bank
5 documents this period
Every document collected, cross-linked, and reconciled into one close
4/4 cross-document checks passed — every fused number reconciles against the source documents.
All required document types present · cross-linked into one event · P&L and cash flow complete and reconciled.
bank=3994.74 vs payslips=3994.74 (Δ 0.00%)
payslip-derived 26.00% vs register 26.00% (Δ 0.00pt)
payment_date=2026-01-31
payslips=3; no register headcount to cross-check
Stress-test: what if a document is missing or mis-read?
This deliberately corrupts one extracted field to show the completeness check at work — a simulation, not a real extraction error.
AWS Bedrock vision reads the numbers; the deterministic engine correlates them across every source document and only releases a close once the documents are complete and agree.
8/8 complete · close pipeline
Every figure traces to a document
Grounded Q&A over your close
Hi — I'm Archon. The January 2026 close is reconciled. Ask me anything about these numbers and I'll trace the answer back to the source documents.